MedeA Crystal Morphology - From Atomic Arrangement to Crystal Shape
At-a-Glance
MedeA®[1] Crystal Morphology employs lattice parameters and space-group symmetry as well as information on relative surface stabilities to simulate the morphology of a crystal.
Key Benefits
Interactive determination of the morphology
Highly flexible choice of different models of relative surface stabilities
When crystals are grown under equilibrium conditions, their macroscopic shape or morphology is determined by the minimum of the total surface free energy of the crystal, which in turn is governed by the microscopic interatomic forces. Since the latter are accessible to atomistic simulations, first-principles calculations of morphologies have become the method of choice to predict crystal morphologies.
At the same time, macroscopically observed morphologies of crystals and crystallites provide insight into the details of materials at the microscopic levels. In particular, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images, as widely employed in the analysis of materials samples, reveal information on the morphology adopted by individual crystallites.
MedeA Crystal Morphology combines the lattice parameters and space-group-symmetry of a crystal with information about the relative energies of low-index crystal faces to simulate the morphology. As originally proposed by Wulff, the length of a surface normal from a given crystal face to a common point within the crystal interior is proportional to its surface energy [2]. Indeed, a crystal shape constructed in this manner minimizes its surface free energy.
The relative stabilities of crystal faces enter via a set of rules proposed by Bravais, Friedel, Donnay and Harker [3],[4] [5]. Alternatively, computed or measured surface energies can be used.
As an example, the morphology of Cr2O3 is displayed in the figure below. It is based on lattice parameters and space-group symmetry as provided by MedeA InfoMaticA as well as surface energies reported by Davies et al. [6]. As expected, the computed morphology reflects the rhombohedral shape of the corundum structure.
MedeA Crystal Morphology Screenshot: Morphology of Cr2O3 as based on reported surface energies [6]
Key Features
An intuitive user interface for the generation of morphologies using lattice parameters and space-group symmetry as input
Full integration with MedeA InfoMaticA
Uses Wulff construction for morphology generation
Relative surface stabilities are automatically determined from the rules introduced by Bravais, Friedel, Donnay and Harker
Alternatively, computed or measured surface energies can be employed
Morphology files can be saved for later use
Optimal graphical representation of results through a variety of visualization options
The morphology of titanium metal and a nano-scale atomic model, containing 24,840 atoms, constructed using MedeA Crystal Morphology.
Model Building
MedeA Crystal Morphology provides model construction capabilities. For any given crystallite morphology, the MedeA Surface Builder can be invoked through a right-click context menu option, facilitating efficient atomic model construction based on crystallite surfaces.
Additionally, nano-scale crystallite atomic models may be constructed using MedeA Crystal Morphology.
Properties
Morphology of arbitrary crystals
Required Modules
MedeA Environment
MedeA Morphology
Find Out More
Check out the closely related datasheet on MedeA Crystal Builder
J. D. H. Donnay et al., “A new law of crystal morphology extending the law of Bravais”, Am. Mineral. 22, 446 (1937)
M. J. Davies et al., J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 2 85, 555 (1989) (DOI)
- download: